Monday, February 01, 2010
Royal Bank of Canada
There might be a better entry point later, if the market stays strong for a few days, but this is shaping up as a terrific short with a target, I'd guess, of about $41.
Another Huge V-Sign of Economic Recovery: ISM Hits 5 1/2 Year High, Predicts GDP Growth = 5.5%
More from Brian Wesbury and Bob Stein:
"If this isn’t a V-shaped recovery, we don’t know what is. Today’s ISM Manufacturing report blew away consensus expectations, surging to the highest level since 2004. The increase in
the ISM shows that the strong real GDP growth of late 2009 was not some kind of one-off inventory-related fluke, but is continuing into 2010. According to the Institute for Supply Management, which publishes the ISM report, an overall index reading of 58.4 is
consistent with real economic growth at a 5.5% annual rate."
It’s Not the 1930s Again --- It's Not Even Close

From Brian Wesbury and Robert Stein:
"Since the financial turmoil began, many analysts, investors and pundits have fretted about a repeat of the Great Depression. However, it’s important to put things in perspective. Real GDP fell for four consecutive years (and by a total of more than 25%) between 1929 and 1933. Unemployment reached 25% (see chart above). Nothing today even comes close. GDP is now rising and we expect unemployment has peaked.
The reason the Great Depression became so great was because government policies were outrageously bad. The Federal Reserve, which was less than two decades old at the time, made huge mistakes, and allowed the money supply to decline by a third between 1929 and 1933. At the same time, President Herbert Hoover increased the top marginal income tax rate from 25% to 63% in 1932 �" a more than 50% reduction in the incentive to work and invest.
The odds of repeating anything like the Great Depression are low and shrinking by the day. It’s not the 1930s, it’s not even close."
MP: In terms of the monthly unemployment rate, we haven't even come close yet to the peak of 10.8% in November and December of 1982, and the average annual rate of 9.3% for 2009 is less than the 9.7% average in 1982 by almost a full half point, and a full point less than the 12-month average of the 10.3% unemployment rate between mid-1982 and mid-1983 (data here).
Yen Decline Expected Against Rising Dollar
USD/YEN technicals are warning me to stay long dollars via the PowerShares DB U.S. Dollar Bullish ETF (UUP) and the UltraShort Yen ProShares ETF (YCS). Apart from the very negative financial press lately concerning the worsening liquidity trap in Japan (fear of another bout of serious deflation within a 21 year balance sheet recession), my technical work is WARNING me that the Yen is about to decline significantly against a rising dollar, which actually will be a positive development for Japanese fundamentals. In the aftermath of the Nov.-Jan. upmove in USD/YEN, let's notice that the correction of that advance held BOTH in the vicinity of the up-slanted 50 DMA, and the 50% support leve of the prior upleg (89.30). The fact that USD/YEN has turned up in the last few sessions, and appears to be initiating a new advance argues strongly from a technical perspective that a powerful upside continuation is about to emerge that will head for 92.70/80 to re-assault the declining 200 DMA and the April-Feb. donw trendline. Usually, the second time the price structure rockets into key resistance after a significant low, price prevails. MJP 2/01/10 Noon ET (90.80)
insert.a.chart.UUP
Is the Dollar Overvalued?
The U.S. dollar has had an incredible run over the past 2 months, leading many traders to wonder whether the dollar is overvalued. The answer is NO. Based upon purchasing power parity, all of the major currencies are still very overvalued against the U.S. dollar - particularly the Aussie.
What does this mean? From a valuation stand-point, the dollar still has room to rise.
What Normally Happens to GDP After Blowout Inventory Quarters?
An interesting analysis in Bloomberg on what normally happens after huge inventory adjustments upward within the Gross Domestic Product. I specifically did not mention last Friday's GDP because it's all hot air to me - for example the GDP deflator, a measure of inflation, came in at 0.6% versus 1.3% expectation. I assume the GDP deflator never has to shop for health insurance, energy, tuition, or goes grocery shopping. That variance of 0.7% between what the government says inflation is, and the economists' expectation directly adds to GDP, overstating it. (not that the economists' expectation is the truth - but the figure is below what America uses as official inflation, CPI - which is itself a highly flawed data point). [May 22, 2008: Bill Gross - Inflation Underplayed by Government]
We have seen the same tricks in previous quarters, in fact in 2008 we saw the folks who compile GDP use completely different inflation data than the government arm that measure inflation! (of course in the GDP it was lower, which helped boost GDP). This and many other such tricks makes analyzing government data a mostly useless exercise so other than acknowleding the data and knowing the market lemmings believe it to be gospel, I refuse to waste too much time on "garbage in, garbage out" which has turned mostly into propaganda. ("you can't handle the truth!") Part of creating solutions to problems is first admitting you have a problem - which our government reports have been "adjusting away" over the years. [ May 10, 2008: Finally Some Mainstream Reporters are Figuring Out the "Spin" from Government] Or they just make the inconvenient reports disappear citing .......(wait for it.....) "high costs". [Apr 23, 2008: Barry Ritholtz on Disappearing Economic Indicators]. All part of living in The Matrix.
On a tangent, this Friday we have a once a year adjustment to (un)employment data - last year at the time the US government suddenly found (under rocks) about 850,000 unemployed that were "missed" during the monthly data. Which in English means, the government admits they understated unemployment by about 70,000 a month. Of course these people were not missed in the Trimtabs data - which people ignore while worshiping at the temple of D.C. statistics. [Dec 6, 2009: TrimTabs Continues to Dispute US Government Payroll Data] So all those months we bought stocks in fervor on the "better than expected" labor data were proven to be a mirage - but don't let that stop us from doing it again. I would expect another 3/4 of a million+ Americans to suddenly find themselves unemployed this Friday - at least in the government's eyes.
But I digress. While it must be taken into consideration there is so much stimulus flowing into the economy via government that all this data represents nothing of the real organic economy [ Nov 18, 2009: Our Economy is on Steroids] - there were some interesting data points in the Bloomberg piece on how incredibly important inventory adjustments are. I was not even aware of this myself. Since everyone believes GDP is some magical measure of "economic health", this story highlights how something that represents just 1% of the output of the US can swing the GDP figures by huge amounts. Consider this another grain of salt, only revealed to those who like to look behind the headlines (an increasingly small amount of people).
- When is quarterly gross domestic product growth of almost 6 percent bad news? When it looks like what was reported last week. U.S. GDP increased 5.7 percent at the end of last year, with more than half of that growth -- 3.4 percent -- attributable to changes in inventories. This astonishing impact of inventory has ample historical precedent, and the bottom line has terrible implications for 2010.
- Inventories are a remarkable corner of the economy. They are the goods and materials that companies keep on hand to make sure that their operations run smoothly. They are the boxes of food on shelves at the grocery store and the bins of metal parts sitting next to the assembly line in a manufacturing plant.
- Inventories were a big part of the story during the worst of this recession, and that is nothing new. In a landmark paper published in 1980, Princeton University economist Alan Blinder found that inventories, while accounting for less than 1 percentage point of national output, accounted for 37 percent of the fluctuations in output. (that's staggering) Since Blinder’s paper came out, inventories have held onto their important role. Updating Blinder’s calculations through the fourth quarter of last year, inventories have accounted for about 34 percent of historical fluctuations in GDP since 1947.
- Inventories are even more important during recessions. In another paper, co-authored with Louis Maccini in 1991, Blinder found that 87 percent of the decline in GDP from the peak to the trough of the recession was attributable to inventories.
- Something that constitutes a small share of GDP can have a big impact on its overall volatility only if it is swinging about wildly. Inventories fluctuate so much for a simple reason: Predicting the future is really hard. A firm tries to set its inventory level to match expected future sales. It must balance the financial cost of carrying inventoried items against the risk that customers might not find the product they are looking for.
- In good times, inventories are relatively easy to manage. Demand grows a little bit each quarter, and firms have a good idea what their future sales will be. Around turning points, expectations can go horribly wrong, and inventories are often the first sign that firms are being surprised by their customers.
- Since 1970, there have been nine quarters, like the last one, when GDP grew by at least 3 percent and inventories accounted for at least half of that growth. The history of those quarters is hardly a favorable sign of what is in store. Inventory spikes make for blowout quarters. In the nine quarters with such spikes, the average growth rate was 6.6 percent and the average inventory contribution was 4.4 percent, even higher than what was observed for last quarter.
- Spikes also produce hangovers. The average growth rate in the quarter after a spike was 0.9 percent, a whopping 5.7 percent lower. In the second quarter following a spike, the average growth rate is just 1.6 percent.
A FORK IN THE ROAD...
The December update on personal income and spending isn’t terribly informative. Disposable personal income rose 0.4% in December, modestly above the monthly average rise during 2009 (0.3%). Meanwhile, personal consumption expenditures increased 0.2% in December, or slightly below average based on the monthly average for last year (0.3%). It all rounds out to a yawn in terms of what one month's numbers tell us. Par for the course.
Still, it’s a bit unnerving to learn that the pace of consumer spending growth in December is down substantially from the 0.6% and 0.7% levels for October and November, respectively. But that’s not terribly surprising, given the ongoing contraction in the labor market. Meantime, there's the general recognition that Joe Sixpack needs to save more than he has been doing over the past generation. That's not exactly an encouraging prescription for what ails the economy at the moment. But it is what it is. Balancing long-term needs with short-term fixes, it seems, is the general dilemma that await, and no one really has a persausive solution.
As for the statistic du jour, if we step back and look at the 12-month rolling change in personal income and spending, it appears that we’ve reached a critical point. As our chart below shows, the annual pace of change for income and spending has nearly returned to the levels that prevailed just before the onset of the recession in December 2007. There’s some debate as to how much of this rebound is due the liquidity injections of monetary policy vs. stimuluative fiscal policy vs. the natural recovery process endemic in the business cycle. Meantime, the pressing issue is whether the bounce in spending and income will continue to climb or at least remain stable at current levels.
Ultimately, the answer resides with the labor market. The next installment of insight on the jobs front arrives this Friday, when the update on nonfarm payrolls is released. From our vantage, the stakes look unusually high (even by recent standards) on the news of whether the labor market is growing or not. If nonfarm payrolls can’t at least show a small net increase at this point, well, let’s not even go there...yet. Suffice to repeat what we said about the trend in nonfarm payrolls: the hour is late.
Quick Trendline Check on Intraday SP500 and SPY Feb 1
I always like to point out simple trendline formations whenever possible, and it would appear we have one of those situations currently in the intraday S&P 500 and SPY charts.
Let’s take a quick look to see where price is likely to travel next if the trendline structure holds.
First, the SPY 30min chart (for the larger perspective):

Price is moving in a contained range as drawn above, between the lower trendline (blue) and 50 period EMA (and upper trendline - also blue).
That would put the next likely move - should the structure hold - to the $109.30 area as seen above.
As a note of trivia, we are also forming a positive momentum divergence in the 3/10 Oscillator - which is associated with a non-confirmation of lower prices (forecasting a potential reversal).
Next, a “zoomed in” view of the 5-min SP500:

This chart looks choppy - and certainly it is - but the main idea is that IF the trendline consolidation structure holds in place, THEN the next likely move (short-term) is to continue this swing back to the 1,093 area.
Be mindful for any deviation (change) in this structure, such as a sudden down-turn from here or a break under the lower trendline and prior swing low at the 1,070 level.
Corey Rosenbloom, CMT
Afraid to Trade.com
Driving for profits with transportation ETFs
"One sector that is deeply intertwined with economic recovery is transportation," says fund expert Ron Rowland.
insert.a.chart.FAA
In Money & Markets, he explains, "We live in a mobile society, even if we are in the internet age. Not only do we move ourselves around, we also depend on quick, efficient transport to sustain our advanced economy.
"Ever wonder how your neighborhood grocery store keeps fresh fruit and vegetables year-round?
"Transportation, that's how. Food doesn't just magically move itself from wherever it grows to wherever you are. Someone has to haul it �" by truck, railroad, ship, or airplane. And even when you shop online, those purchased products must be delivered.
"Watching transportation stocks is a good way to keep an eye on the overall health of the economy. When demand starts to pick up, transport companies have to get busy moving stuff around.
"Remember, a lot of stuff has to be moved before consumers actually buy it. That means the transportation companies are among the first to benefit from economic recovery. When the transports take off, there's a good chance the rest of the economy won't be far behind.
"It works the other way around, too. When business slows down, merchants cut back their orders. Next thing you know, ships are sitting idle in ports and trucks are driving around half-empty. This is often apparent long before manufacturers and distributors see their own volumes drop.
"So how can you play the transport sector? I have a suggestion for you ... Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) offer a quick and easy way to get exposure to most market sectors.
"Transports are, I must say, a little bit underserved. Currently U.S. investors have access to only one broad transport sector ETF, and three more specialized offerings.
"One reason for this is that stocks don't always fit into neat categories. Consider Boeing (BA). They make airplanes that are used by transportation companies. But Boeing's biggest customer, by far, is the U.S. government along with foreign military forces. So is Boeing a transport stock, a defense stock, or both? It's not easy to say.
"Most index providers classify the transports as a subset of the "industrial" sector. If you buy SPDR S&P Industrials (XLI), for example, you'll have a piece of conglomerates like General Electric (GE) as well as transport stocks like FedEx (FDX) and Union Pacific (UNP). (You'll have Boeing, too.)
"If you want to zero in specifically on the transportation stocks, the best choice is iShares Dow Jones Transportation Average Index Fund (IYT). This is an ETF that follows the venerable Dow Transports index, which includes 20 of the top U.S. railroads, truckers, delivery services, airlines, and shipping companies.
In addition to IYT, there are three ETFs that cover more specific niches within the transportation sector:
• Claymore/NYSE Arca Airline ETF (NYSE: FAA) holds airline stocks. This is a particularly volatile niche. Airlines regularly face vicious competition, rising fuel costs, and labor unrest. Yet these stocks can truly fly when conditions are right. Since its inception on January 26, 2009, FAA has lagged IYT, but it has started to come on strong the past six months.
• Claymore Delta Global Shipping Index ETF (NYSE: SEA) holds stocks from around the world that are involved in maritime freight transportation. SEA outperformed both FAA and IYT the past year and has been surging the last few weeks, but it is still far below its 2008 peak.
• PowerShares Global Progressive Transportation Portfolio (NASDAQ: PTRP) holds stocks that are involved in the quest for environmentally-friendly means of transportation. This excludes most of the large, well-known industry players. PTRP had the misfortune to be launched in late 2008 just as financial markets began to crater. But it has since recovered nicely.
"Should you buy any of the transport ETFs right now? That's for you to decide. But under the right circumstances, this sector can give you amazing results. So keep your eye on the transports."
2 Graphs Showing Part of the Reason for the Christmas Eve Taxpayer Massacre
2 very nice graphs courtesy of Calculated Risk blog, showing *part* of the reason it was necessary to massacre the US taxpayer in the still of the night Christmas Eve - i.e. put the US taxpayer on the hook for unlimited losses for the next 3 years (rather than the originally promised $200 BILLION, raised to $400 BILLION). [Jan 5, 2010: WSJ - The Treasury Department's Christmas Eve Masscare of the US Taxpayer] Huge waves of losses shall continue to wash upon our shores...
Fannie Mae is the larger entity of the two but you could effectively overlay the graphs onto 1 chart and you'd see the same "hockey stick" growth. Keep in mind these are older loans that have had time to go bad - with conventional lenders more than happy to stuff as many new mortgage loans (many at 3.5% down or less with a tax credit) as the government will suck up... the denominator (# of mortgages) is exploding higher therefore it should be helping to keep these figures contained, as X amount of bad loans divided by a serious increase of total mortgages would lead to a smaller figure. So to see these percentages run into the stratosphere even as the government now dominates the housing market, and Fannie/Freddie vacuum in ever increasing amounts of mortgages ... well, let's just say the data is far worse than it would look on first appearance.
Rate of Serious Delinquency (at least 90 days late) for conventional single family
Fannie Mae 5.29% in November 2009 v 2.13% in November 2008
Freddie Mac 3.87% in December 2009 v 1.72% in December 2008
(note the Fannie Mae data is 1 month delayed versus Freddie Mac)
[Sep 7, 2008: Bailout Nation Continues - Fannie/Freddie Now Owned by You]
And don't forget about the FHA program, another "innovative solution" to "save the housing market" - at the minor cost of a few generations of debt.... [Nov 18, 2009: Toll Brothers CEO - "Yesterday's Subprime is Today's FHA"]
THE AGE OF NUANCE
January was a rough month for risky assets. For the first time since the financial crisis raged in late-2008, the red ink that spilled was broad and deep across the broad asset classes on a calendar-month basis. Bonds generally held their own in January, but stocks, REITs and commodities suffered sizable retreats.
It was an orderly bout of selling, at least compared to what prevailed a year ago. The bigger question is whether the reversal of January is a sign that the great reflation in the capital and commodity markets in 2009 is over. The answer is probably “yes.” Does that mean that a new bear market is upon us? No, or at least we don’t expect one. But it’s time to anticipate something other than strong, sustained rallies in everything. The money game now appears destined for a more complicated era.
If the intense wave of selling in late-2008 and early 2009 was the perfect storm, the past year or so has been the perfect rebound. After selling off deeply, risky assets were priced for a world of economic collapse. By the spring of 2009, it became clear that the world would survive, which triggered a wave of buying to return the price of risk to something closer to normal. That process is probably complete. If so, the future will bring more months like January, where a mix of results prevails.
Of course, we've been anticipating no less. Back on October 1, for instance, we wrote that "correlations among the various subgroups of stocks, bonds, REITs and commodities are destined for a wider divergence. Designing and managing portfolios, as a result, will become more challenging in the years ahead." And so it has, at least for January. The complication, we think, has legs.
Indeed, the economic outlook is now more complicated, which has spilled over into asset pricing. Absolutes, for good and ill, have dominated in the recent past. Goodbye to all that. The age of nuance has only just begun.
4 Lower Lows Above The 200ma
The SPX has now made 4 lower lows. In the May 9, 2008 blog I showed a study that examined 4 lower lows. It broke it out above and below the 200ma. Updated results above the 200ma are below:

Results here are fairly bullish. This is just one of several studies I am following at the moment. The vast majority are suggesting a short-term upside edge. A word of caution that I’ve been discussing in the subscriber letter is that the market has been acting abnormally for the last 5-6 days. This increases risk and traders must decide how they want to handle it.
Weekly Market Commentary - Feb 1
Weekly Market Commentary- (Jan 25-Jan 29)
DJIA Industrial Average
Open: 10175.10
High: 10323.00
Low: 10,014.35
Close: 10,067.33
Change: -107.77 (-1.0%)
RSI: 27.19
MACD: -32.29
Strategy: The stock indices have been showing signs of tiring out and are showing a sell off on all negative reports. Traders should wait for lower levels of a double bottom around 10000 before re-entering the markets.
Highlights of week:
· U.S. stocks declined for a third week, sending the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index down the most for any month since February, as technology companies missed earnings estimates. Compared to a 1.6% fall on S&P 500 index, even the Dow Index also fell by around 1.0% or 107 points to levels close to 10075 points. However, the Nasdaq Composite took a harder knock following a strong sell off following the results disappointment in many stocks like Qualcomm, Motorola, and some uncertainty in Apple Inc and Yahoo etc.
· Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke finally won the confirmation for a second term after a lot of debate, leading to some comfort in the market for a short time in the week.
· US GDP clocked an initial estimate of 5.7% GDP growth, much higher than expected.
· In all, the Dow Industrial Average ended up the entire week with losses of 435.39 points or 4.2%.
· After touching $82 earlier, crude oil, retraced to nearly $73 per barrel in the futures.
· The Dollar Index remained strong for a major part of the week, and the same ended the week at a level of around 79, due to strengthening of US $ against Euro.
· Gold continued to slip for a major part of the week due to strong US $, dragging it to a level below $1075 at one stage during the week.
· After the tightening of monetary policy by
·
· Commodities continued to remain weak including most of the non-ferrous metals like copper and aluminum.
· US Present announced some additional tax credits of $22 billion to create more jobs, as the unemployment rate has shot up beyond 10% in the country.
The Weekly Commentary
The DJIA retraced by 1.0% to 10067.33 points, or 107 points, which was largely led by some correction in some of the technology stocks, whose results failed to subsequently cheer the markets. A weak sentiment prevailed even in the financial stocks like Bank of America, Amex, JP Morgan Chase and a Citigroup Inc barring the last couple of sessions.
Amongst the non index stocks, Berkshire Hathway and Eastman Kodak got into focus, as the former gained a place in S&P 500 and Eastman Kodak earnings beat the street expectations by a wide margin. However, Qualcomm and Motorola Inc. remained subdued after the earnings, and even the Microsoft did not gain after the earnings, due to possibilities that it may not grow in near future due to slow recovery in US. Apple remained volatile after the launch of its ipad, due to mixed reactions on account of success of product due to pricing issue.
Amongst the basic material stocks, U.S. Steel fell the most in the S&P 500, dropping 19 percent to $44.43. Fitch Ratings slashed its senior unsecured notes to below investment grade as the company struggles to return to profitability.
Meanwhile, the only positive economic indicator was that the US GDP growth for Q4 came at 5.7% compared to an expected 4.8%.
The precious metal continued to show a correction during the week following the strength in the
Meanwhile, the Dollar Index continued to strengthen throughout the week, mainly due to the
Crude also slipped during the week, which was around $73 at the end of Friday.
A lot of index companies from Dow components are releasing their earnings in next week. These include Telecom major Cisco Systems Inc., Exxon Mobil Corp., UPS Inc., Time Warner Inc., and Pfizer Inc.
The Week Ahead
Monday: Construction spending for December
ISM Manufacturing Index
Tuesday: ICSC-Goldman Sachs Retail Stores Sales
Wednesday: ADP will release its January employment data.
ISM services report for January.
Weekly crude inventories report
Thursday: The Labor Department's weekly jobless claims report
Friday:
Latest reading on the unemployment rate.
Stock Pick of the Day - Computer Program & Services Inc.
Stock Pick of the Day
Computer Program & Services Inc. (NASDAQ: CPSI)
Closing Price: $37.63
RSI: 18.29
MACD: -1.01
insert.a.chart.CPSI
Computer Program & Services Inc. (NASDAQ: CPSI) breached below its long term support level of 200 day moving average for the first time after a gap of ten months by mid-day trading on Friday. Computer Program & Services Inc. (CPSI) plunged by close to 15% with heavy volumes following dismal earnings it posted in Q4. These are clear indicators of a bearish trend which may follow in the stock.
Computer Program & Services Inc. (CPSI) mopped up profits which were almost 25.8% lower than comparable quarter’s earnings for comparable quarter of previous year. Computer Program & Services Inc. (CPSI) is likely to search for lower levels following the gap-down opening on Friday.



