Free Swing Trading and Day Trading Picks & Education

Instead of looking at the Euro Index, let’s take a look at the Euro - US Dollar FOREX Pair - EURUSD - and see the current ‘color chart’ along with two sets of momentum divergences and an Elliott Wave count.  Sound complex?  Let’s look at it step by step.

(Click for full-size image)

We see a daily graph of the EURUSD starting with mid-2008 so we can see the lengthy positive momentum divergence through early 2009 that preceded the rally phase that has taken us to the current levels of 1.5000.

Since then, a lengthy negative momentum divergence has formed, which serves as a non-confirmation of the angular price rise off the early 2009 lows.

The oscillator is a color version of the 3/10 Oscillator I use (information via the link).

The oscillator formed a momentum peak in December 2008, but to compare price to the oscillator, we’ll use the March 2009 peak so we can follow along with the divergence which also corresponds with the stock market rise off the March 2009 lows.

In addition, I’m showing a possible 5-wave fractal Elliott Wave count, in which the final fractal 5th wave itself is subdivided into a 5-wave progression that has reached its peak at one of the lowest positive readings in the momentum oscillator.

Though it’s difficult to see, the 50 day EMA rests at 1.04656, a level to watch for support… or an acceleration of price to the downside if this level fails to hold here.

What remains is a battle between the “simple” form of technical analysis - trend continuation which is bullish - vs the more ‘advanced’ concepts of Elliott Wave and lengthy negative momentum divergences (bearish).

For those who don’t trade or monitor FOREX, you can watch the Euro Index under symbol $XEU in StockCharts.com or most other charting platforms.

For more analysis on the US Dollar Index and broader Cross-Markets, consider subscribing to our Weekly Intermarket Technical Analysis service.

Corey Rosenbloom, CMT
Afraid to Trade.com

It is one thing when a few analysts say that commercial real estate, that $3 trillion elephant in the room, is going to experience trouble starting next year.  It is another thing when billionaire investor Wilbur Ross comes out and states that commercial real estateis going to crash and burn.  We’ve been looking at commercial real estate for sometime and the U.S. Treasuryhas already had talks regarding a preemptive CRE bailout called “Plan C.”

The commercial real estate sector is even more fragile than residential real estate because commercial space is a direct reflection of the health of the economy.  In other words, how much office space do you need without workers?  How many strip malls can you fill without shoppers?  Not many.  Commercial real estate is also financed in a unique way where loans are refinanced typically on five year terms.  Many are coming due starting next year.  Friday’s multiple bank failures, 9 in one day and a cost of $2.5 billion to the FDIC fund, was the most closures in one day since the recession started.  Even with this giant number, most of the assets at FDIC insured banks sit with a few banks:

The FDIC insures over 8,000 banks covering $13.3 trillion in assets.  In reality, 100 banks hold over $10 trillion of those assets.  The banks that are failing typically do not fall in the top 100.  And many of these recent bank failures are starting to show signs of commercial real estatefatigue.  Ross summed up the overall scenario well:

“(FT) All of the components of real estate value are going in the wrong direction simultaneously,” said Ross, one of nine money managers participating in a government program to remove toxic assets from bank balance sheets. “Occupancy rates are going down. Rent rates are going down and the capitalization rate - the return that investors are demanding to buy a property - are going up.”

There is some form of twisted irony in the above.  The government has tunnel vision focus on residential real estate.  The Federal Reservehas bought nearly $1.25 trillion in GSE MBS thus keeping mortgage rates at historical lows.  Not enough?  What about a nice $8,000 tax credit?  Still need more?  What about going with FHA insured loans that only require 3.5 percent down?  In other words, the government has stepped into the vacuum left by the toxic mortgage lenders.  So we shouldn’t be surprised when FHA insured loans, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac loan portfolios start showing historic amounts of defaults.  Yet the consequence of pushing many renters to homeownership, is you speed up the crash in commercial real estate.  We should be honest and admit that not everyone can be a homeowner.  And this is okay.  They can rent.  Nothing wrong with that.  But now we are seeing enormous apartment vacancy rates because we are temporarily shifting some into homes they cannot afford.  They will only default later as we have seen with the current decade long housing bubble.

Commercial real estate is a gigantic line item of the FDIC insured banks:

In fact, if you add up nonfarm residential, construction and equipment, and commercial/industrial loans the number is approximately $3 trillion.  Contrast this to the $2 trillion in more conventional residential loans.  In other words, this has the potential of being bigger than the residential downturn.  Commercial real estate values took longer to fall than residential property values, but not only have they caught up, they have surpassed the percentage amount of declines:

With many of these loans coming due in the next few years, the question will focus on the ability of companies to get the loans refinanced.  But who will take on a loan of an empty commercial building?  For residential property, the government for better or worse has a big mechanism through Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and FHA insured loans to buy up these loans.  The government currently backs 95 percent of all residential mortgages.  It is the market.  Yet with commercial real estate, there really isn’t a government mechanism fortunately (that is, unless the U.S. Treasuryplows through with Plan Cand starts bailing out this industry).

The FDIC and other agencies are trying to jump out in front of this freight train.  Maybe it isn’t call Plan C but something is in the works:

“(AP) WASHINGTON - Banks must accurately identify their potential losses when modifying troubled commercial real estate loans under federal guidelines issued Friday.

Regulators have warned that rising losses on commercial real estate loans pose risks for U.S. banks, with small and mid-size banks especially vulnerable. Nearly $500 billion in commercial real estate loans are expected to come due annually over the next few years.

Agencies including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Federal Reserve and Office of Thrift Supervision released the new guidelines for banks, which emphasize that modifying loans in a prudent fashion is often in the best interest of both the bank and the creditworthy commercial borrower.

Under the guidelines, loans to creditworthy borrowers that have been restructured and are current won’t be classified as high risk by regulators solely because the collateral backing them has declined to an amount less than the loan balance.”

This will be a fascinating challenge here.  Jean Paul Getty had it right when he said, “If you owe the bank $100 that’s your problem. If you owe the bank $100 million, that’s the bank’s problem.”  And the banks have a gigantic problem.  You can expect workouts but what can you workout with a property that is completely vacant?  Is there any price point that will work?  We are going to find out soon enough.

The commercial real estatedebacle is coming in line with the appearance of a stabilization in the residential market.  The CRE debacle has the potential to destabilize the market again.  Expect to see more banks go under because of horrible CRE loans.

How Did a Dead Mathematician Nail Two Major Markets Yesterday?

The markets I am referring to are the gold market and euro markets. Readers of this blog will know from our previous videos and examples that we are big fans of Fibonacci retracement lines.

In this super short video (1:49), I will show you the lines we are talking about for the above two markets. I think you’ll find it very illuminating as this example is so fresh. You will also find it very empowering.

As always our videos are free to watch and there is no need to register. Please feel free to give your feedback and comments on this blog.

All the best,

5 ETFs That You Need to Look at Right Now

The five ETFs that we are referring to are going to play a major role in the future and you need to know about them today.

In this short video I show you the overriding trend and potential for each of these markets in the future.

As always our videos are free to watch and there is no need for registration. We would appreciate your valuable feedback on this posting and let us know whether you found it helpful or not.

All the best,

Folks, sorry about the color scheme in some of my charts.  I am partially colorblind in one eye (have trouble seeing green ... no pun intended) so that is why my bars are white or black.  Anyway, I'd like to discuss my trader psychology of the moment.  At the end of a fairly successful week, I find myself in cash because of my indecision on what's next.  It feels like we are at a crossroads here.  We've been offered another chance to decide between the red pill and the blue pill (for those unfamiliar with the Matrix reference, red pill = reality, blue pill = la-la land).

So far, my /DX EW counts have been agreeing fairly well with the recent bottoming action in /DX implying further downside in equities and (some) commodities.  /DX has broken an ending diagonal triangle and seems to be breaking an 8-month (red) channel ... and it has done this with volume.  I have been waiting months for this and this recent action in the USD supports the case for markets taking the red pill and coming back down to reality (albeit possibly slowly).

Being short equities, short (some) commodities, and long the USD is a contrary position to the superfluous bullishness of the past 8 months.  However, the contrarian to my contrarian is screaming at me ... telling me the powers that be will keep knocking the red pill out of our hands everytime we try and take it and will force feed us the blue pill again.  This is what I think more blue pill action may look like in SPX.

I went fractal hunting for a down-up-down pattern that ended up being a local minimum (hilighted in the dark gray).  Sometnush

hing from mid-May caught my attention; a similar down-up-down pattern.  If this May/June fractal repeats itself, we could end up seeing a head-and-shoulders-oid  topping formation.  Anyway, just my 2 cents ... I'm hoping we take the red pill but it could go either way so I'm staying nimble.